Burda Style For people who sew
Description
I reduced this pattern 92% from size 36 and printed it.
But I feel they are still large.
Next time, I intend to reduce a thigh width.
Because I thought that I want basic pants, I am very glad to get them. The article of the blog : (http://blog.livedoor.jp/miho555/archives/51477797.html)
Material Notes
cotton stretch (Reggiani), waistband ｆacing ： cotton stretch print (JUST CAVALLI)
Categories
Credits
Burdastyle
4 Comments
Featured
-
Project of the Week
The Tikva Trench
A sweet, swinging year round staple for all occasions!
-
Article of the Week
Vintage Sewing: Unprinted Patterns
Ever worked with a vintage pattern that has no markings? Figure out how it works!
-
Member Project of the Week
Dalmatian dress/top
lizzie225 has done it again with this great top/dress creation!
-
Blast from the Past
Amy S. Hoodie
This basic hoodie is the perfect base to keep you warm and stylish
-
Technique of the week
How to draft a "leaf" pleated bodice
Learn how to alter a basic bodice into a "leaf" pleated bodice
Jan 12, 2008, 07.13 PMby miho555
to Jj,
The reason why I choose the method is I would shrink length of crotch as you say. When I watch a Burda size chart, height setting is 168cm in all sizes. Size 32 – size 60 are the same height! This is inconvenient for me.
I don’t like that legs are seen shorter when a knee position falls down. I can keep a reasonable knee position by reducing. The length of the zipper slit becomes shorter by reducing, but it did not become difficult to wear it.
You try it and tell an impression if possible!
Jan 12, 2008, 03.33 PMby JJ1
I would love to have seam allowance shrink to 1/2" but is it
going effect the length of crotch too??…especially the zipper
area…or may be the 92% doesn’t change that much…
I’m going try to download a few pieces of pattern to try on.
How much s.a. do you get after the shrinking business?
Jan 12, 2008, 08.51 AMby miho555
>to Jj,
Because I am short, I thought that the normal grading did not work well. I think that this method is good for the woman of the short and thin figure. Please watch out because seam allowance width becomes narrow!
Jan 12, 2008, 05.53 AMby JJ1
Nice pants. I’ve never thought of reduce/down grade the size
like this way before, did it really work?